Comments on: Return of GUID.org http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/ Ruminations of a Startup CEO Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:18:42 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: increasewebsitetraffic http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/comment-page-1/#comment-79330 increasewebsitetraffic Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:22:37 +0000 http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/#comment-79330 Good information...keep it flowing.<br>For marketing choose <a href="http://www.seotrafficspider.com" rel="nofollow">Affordable SEO Services</a>. Good information…keep it flowing.
For marketing choose Affordable SEO Services.

]]> By: seoe2 http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/comment-page-1/#comment-79207 seoe2 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:13:19 +0000 http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/#comment-79207 p><a href="http://www.pumaword.com/" rel="nofollow">puma shoes </a> </p><br><p><a href="http://www.pumaword.com/womens-puma-future-cat-low-c-514.html" rel="nofollow">Women's Puma Future Cat Low </a> </p><br><p> <a href="http://www.pumaword.com/womens-puma-engine-cat-low-c-503.html" rel="nofollow">Women's Puma ENGINE Cat Low </a> </p><br><p> <a href="http://www.pumaword.com/mens-puma-trionfo-lo-l-ii-c-521.html" rel="nofollow">Men's Puma TRIONFO LO L II </a> <br><br></p> p>puma shoes

Women's Puma Future Cat Low

Women's Puma ENGINE Cat Low

Men's Puma TRIONFO LO L II

]]> By: Sorry, no Privacy here - Stock Market Analysis at DeepMarket http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/comment-page-1/#comment-37313 Sorry, no Privacy here - Stock Market Analysis at DeepMarket Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:40:14 +0000 http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/#comment-37313 [...] Return of GUID.org [via Zemanta] [...] [...] Return of GUID.org [via Zemanta] [...]

]]> By: ts http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/comment-page-1/#comment-15310 ts Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:04:03 +0000 http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/#comment-15310 Good point, Glenn. I wish I had the time to try to organize such a standard and policy, but I don't. And you are right, there is quite a bit of confusion about what is meant by "privacy" - partially because the word is constantly redefined by "consumer advocacy" groups... Good point, Glenn. I wish I had the time to try to organize such a standard and policy, but I don’t. And you are right, there is quite a bit of confusion about what is meant by “privacy” – partially because the word is constantly redefined by “consumer advocacy” groups…

]]> By: Glenn http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/comment-page-1/#comment-15138 Glenn Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:55:43 +0000 http://www.oxyfish.com/wordpress/2007/08/08/return-of-guidorg/#comment-15138 This is a pretty good idea, as a technology and solution. I think the pony here would be organizing a standard and use policy in major technical organizations to gain acceptance. I'm not sure it really addresses what people are worried about though. When someone is trying to remain anonymous, the concept of their identity isn't necessarily attached to a social security/license/etc. As the solution allows for a more centralized assignment of "identity" to each "node" on the internet it would likely be even more unattractive to the users seeking to remain anonymous. The guid in this case becomes the person and can be used to identify them (though only through more intrusive interaction such as seizing of hardware or information theft). I tend to think that the adopters of this technology would be the people who aren't worried about being tracked online. Perhaps the masses wouldn't much care though, incredibly increasing the value of such technology to the industry. This is a pretty good idea, as a technology and solution. I think the pony here would be organizing a standard and use policy in major technical organizations to gain acceptance. I’m not sure it really addresses what people are worried about though. When someone is trying to remain anonymous, the concept of their identity isn’t necessarily attached to a social security/license/etc. As the solution allows for a more centralized assignment of “identity” to each “node” on the internet it would likely be even more unattractive to the users seeking to remain anonymous. The guid in this case becomes the person and can be used to identify them (though only through more intrusive interaction such as seizing of hardware or information theft). I tend to think that the adopters of this technology would be the people who aren’t worried about being tracked online. Perhaps the masses wouldn’t much care though, incredibly increasing the value of such technology to the industry.

]]>